Sunday, June 27, 2010

Removing Urine From Dog Run

Sicuri che sia proprio voglia di protagonismo?

at this moment I am reading the indictment that the prosecutor
cat is doing at the trial of Dell'Utri. It seems someone placed a frame of bourgeois liberal
Induno, but in moderation of its appearance, has the words
revolutionary to those judges who were more 'times in the mouth of
politicians and journalists in recent days.
"Today is the power to be giudicato.Oggi you have to take a historic decision that relates not only to the judicial history but the history of the country. By your decision you can make a step, went up which you can take further steps to ensure truth that has torn and bloodied our country. There is no envy. " The words of a plea, you know, are often full of solemn meaning, sometimes even sounding pompous caricature or if those with posture by Vittorio Gassman. But I do not think this is the case.

But I think that this could be the real turning point of the judiciary
Second Republic, an event record in the process with memory comparable
Enimont held in Milan in 92-93. Even then
a criminal trial, then for corruption and illegal financing, and 'was
the opportunity to introduce even more' (if this was necessary ...
) the party system of the First Republic. A sort of pick that
and 'managed to slip off the Milan prosecutors
the elite of Italian politics and business, and no one complained then
a legitimate impediment.
The preliminary analysis at this point would raise the people who invented and uses the label of "executioner" (pass the time but I still have to understand what these people refer to this name), is that the attorney for the umpteenth time, more or less politicized, have placed themselves in politics to subvert the popular mandate given by voters to their representatives.
He feels this expression for some time now, and I must say that I am almost convinced myself, but for different reasons.

If politics is defined as the ultimate meaning to the good of the polis, it is likely that this is correct. But more deeply, the problem is that (all Italian) inability to distinguish the level of political responbilitĂ  from criminal liability. If there was a high sense of political responsibility our ruling classes, without having to wait for the now-famous final ruling probably would not be necessary to arrive at the court of a tribunal to a level (even) the historical actions of any politician. But in Italy, as I said, it is not.

Then, the need to clarify the strength to go to a court order, which most times is commonplace, but in some cases (such as dell'Utri) becomes a decision on an entire political stage. I do not think that the judiciary will gladly take this burden, if the policy was capable on its own initiative to resolve questions of morality and good administration of public affairs. But it know, until you have water in my throat ...

0 comments:

Post a Comment