There was a time in Italy, where Mussolini drew up the dossier on the leaders of the National Fascist Party, in order to control, according to him most effectively, internal dissent. This was not a wrong method, because a prototype as the Italian Duce, understood better than anyone else in stills which is distilled the mindset of the average.
With the advent of republican democracy, the use of the instrument of dossieraggio still retains its own certain charm, and it is no coincidence that the Divo by Paolo Sorrentino at some point in the film does recite this monologue: "Over the years I have been honored by numerous nicknames ... but I never complained. For a simple reason. I have a sense of humor. Another thing I have: a large archive, as I do not have much imagination. And every time I talk about this file, who must remain silent, as if by magic, he begins to speak ".
The meaning of these words attributed to Andreotti, they can give back to the meaning of the complexity of the relationship with the power to humanity that surrounds it. With a substantial difference compared to the two decades: the need for a driver's political respectability within a dictatorship that is reflected only by the authority of the Chief. In Government of the demos, this is unacceptable, and it is necessary that an entire community enjoys a morality becomes just public morality.
Hence the move to list as musical instrument of political struggle that is common names, birth dates, numbers, cards or money. in the course of Republican history lists go up to the headlines have been different. To name the most important and paradigmatic for the purposes of analysis, come to mind that of P2 and that of the Mitrokhin dossier.
E 'is very well known what happened in 1981, ie when to Castiglion Fibocchi near Pistoia, was made Note the list of members of a mysterious Masonic lodge to almost exclusive use of Licio Gelli. Much is known about how many and what the public reaction had at that time. Less is known about human reactions of the characters involved, ranging from the denial of objections (Longo, former secretary of PSDI), the claim of the goodness of the lodge as a musical instrument of the democratic will intensifier (Cicchitto, yes ... that Cicchitto).
In any event, was unable to attend a general attitude of "dissociation" in relation to P2, to the extent that the same Gelli has also recently complained about this behavior. The public perception of the bond of secrecy does not considered more acceptable. Therefore you try, at last also to discredit those who did not was a member, to convey the message that the list of members was not complete (in the case of General Dalla Chiesa).
Less but more interesting is the case nazionalpopolare Mitrokhin. The pending resolution of a case praticamnte nonexistent by a parliamentary commission of inquiry that has worked for years on nothing has meant that the Italians were for a long time waiting for a new list, a new scandal, first and last names to pronounce in disbelief.
Qantar has happened in these days, and in particular Today, with the publication of the names of those who received favors from Anemone Diego, is nothing more than yet another replica of the Italian prouderie all want to look through the keyhole of Serrat, looking for that original sin, which makes then look like the powerful man in the street.
can be healthy, in this view, a method of information that illuminates the dark side of power when it comes out of its tracks. But there is a but. There is the flip side, the fact that the analytical capacity of a collettvo melts and does not work in front of names, figures that within a few days more will not take up the first pages of the newspapers. A more so that the collective is called Italy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment